Re: [PATCH v1 10/11] backports: prefix c-file / h-file auto backport with BPAUTO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 09:02 +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:

> > But the *code* changes
> > you're making here that check whether bp_prefix is being duplicated
> > aren't necessary for that, and are in fact confusing and dangerous.
> 
> Understood, thanks for the review, hopefully this is addressed with the
> latest series.

Actually, maybe you wanted these changes because you didn't want to end
up with CONFIG_BACKPORT_BPAUTO_ for integration? I think that's a small
price to pay though for code complexity trade-off, IMHO you should
accept CONFIG_BACKPORT_BPAUTO_ and remove the code changes.

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux