On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 13:22 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > FWIW, it's probably more efficient to just put them all into one > > net_nfc.patch file. The only reason they're split by *file* rather than > > by *logical group* right now is that it was easy to do automatically and > > solved the problem I had (of wanting to copy only some drivers and then > > applying only some patches). For this it's not really needed or even > > useful to split by file, it was just the fastest way :-) > > > > So I think it'd make sense to put it into a single file, but I'm happy > > to apply it as-is as well (though I want to give others more time to > > review, so I'll not do it today) > > How about a directory alone for NFC patches as we do for DRM. In fact > perhaps Bluetooth should be split out from network as well, just as > ethernet. That is, per subsystem. Personally, I don't care. In fact, I'm going to change the apply process a bit to just read any *.patch file, sort the list and then see if they need to applied (in that order) -- that way we don't have to put things all those levels down etc. and can split it up in any logical way we like. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
