On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 23:20 +0200, Thierry Escande wrote: > .../network/53-pr_fmt/net_nfc_core.patch | 13 ++++ > .../network/53-pr_fmt/net_nfc_hci_command.patch | 13 ++++ > .../network/53-pr_fmt/net_nfc_hci_core.patch | 13 ++++ > .../network/53-pr_fmt/net_nfc_hci_hcp.patch | 13 ++++ > .../network/53-pr_fmt/net_nfc_hci_llc_shdlc.patch | 13 ++++ > .../network/53-pr_fmt/net_nfc_llcp_commands.patch | 13 ++++ > .../network/53-pr_fmt/net_nfc_llcp_llcp.patch | 13 ++++ > .../network/53-pr_fmt/net_nfc_llcp_sock.patch | 13 ++++ > .../network/53-pr_fmt/net_nfc_nci_core.patch | 13 ++++ > .../network/53-pr_fmt/net_nfc_nci_data.patch | 13 ++++ > .../network/53-pr_fmt/net_nfc_nci_ntf.patch | 13 ++++ > .../network/53-pr_fmt/net_nfc_nci_rsp.patch | 12 ++++ > .../network/53-pr_fmt/net_nfc_netlink.patch | 13 ++++ > .../network/53-pr_fmt/net_nfc_rawsock.patch | 13 ++++ FWIW, it's probably more efficient to just put them all into one net_nfc.patch file. The only reason they're split by *file* rather than by *logical group* right now is that it was easy to do automatically and solved the problem I had (of wanting to copy only some drivers and then applying only some patches). For this it's not really needed or even useful to split by file, it was just the fastest way :-) So I think it'd make sense to put it into a single file, but I'm happy to apply it as-is as well (though I want to give others more time to review, so I'll not do it today) johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html