On Tue, 2018-07-03 at 07:48 +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 3:34 AM, Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 2018-07-02 at 14:15 +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 1:55 PM, tomas <tomasbortoli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Yes, thanks. Please use my full name, Tomas Bortoli. > > > > > > > > > Please also include: > > > > > > Reported-by: syzbot+60c837b428dc84e83a93@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Done. > > > > > > > > from the original bug report. This this help to keep automatic testing > > > process running. > > > > Umm ... should I include this email address on the actual cc when > > submitting the patch? > > It does not matter. It's a real email address too, so CCing it is > fine. So if git does it automatically (does it?) then just go with it. > If you are doing it manually, then it's not necessary to add it to CC. Right, I thought a mail would probably be sent at merge time (or perhaps when Andrew adds it to mmotm) so I didn't think it sensible to cc when submitting. Personally I use StGIT to manage patches and that will only send to addresses specified when patches are emailed. > > syzbot will scrape git log later to discover the tag and mark the bug fixed. > > Thanks > > > > > On 07/02/2018 12:20 PM, Ian Kent wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2018-07-02 at 10:31 +0200, tomas wrote: > > > > > > Hi Ian, > > > > > > > > > > > > you are welcome! > > > > > > > > > > > > yes your patch is much better. You should just put the "_IOC_NR" > > > > > > macro > > > > > > around "cmd" in the lines added to "validate_dev_ioctl" to make it > > > > > > work. > > > > > > > > > > LOL, yes, that was a dumb mistake. > > > > > > > > > > I'll send it to Andrew Morton, after some fairly simple sanity > > > > > testing, > > > > > with both our Signed-off-by added. > > > > > > > > > > > Tomas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 07/02/2018 03:42 AM, Ian Kent wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, 2018-07-02 at 09:10 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2018-07-02 at 00:04 +0200, tomas wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've looked into this issue found by Syzbot and I made a > > > > > > > > > patch: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=d03abd8b42847f7f69b1d1d7f > > > > > > > > > 9720 > > > > > > > > > 8ae425 > > > > > > > > > b116 > > > > > > > > > 3 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Umm ... oops! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for looking into this Tomas. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The autofs subsystem does not check that the "path" parameter > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > present > > > > > > > > > within the "param" struct passed by the userspace in case the > > > > > > > > > AUTOFS_DEV_IOCTL_OPENMOUNT_CMD command is passed. Indeed, it > > > > > > > > > assumes a > > > > > > > > > path is always provided (though a path is not always present, > > > > > > > > > as > > > > > > > > > per how > > > > > > > > > the struct is defined: > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/include/uapi/lin > > > > > > > > > ux/a > > > > > > > > > uto_de > > > > > > > > > v-io > > > > > > > > > ct > > > > > > > > > l.h#L89). > > > > > > > > > Skipping the check provokes an oob read in "strlen", called by > > > > > > > > > "getname_kernel", in turn called by the autofs to assess the > > > > > > > > > length of > > > > > > > > > the non-existing path. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To solve it, modify the "validate_dev_ioctl" function to check > > > > > > > > > also that > > > > > > > > > a path has been provided if the command is > > > > > > > > > AUTOFS_DEV_IOCTL_OPENMOUNT_CMD. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- b/fs/autofs/dev-ioctl.c 2018-07-01 23:10:16.059728621 > > > > > > > > > +0200around > > > > > > > > > +++ a/fs/autofs/dev-ioctl.c 2018-07-01 23:10:24.311792133 > > > > > > > > > +0200 > > > > > > > > > @@ -136,6 +136,9 @@ static int validate_dev_ioctl(int cmd, s > > > > > > > > > goto out; > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > + /* AUTOFS_DEV_IOCTL_OPENMOUNT_CMD without path */ > > > > > > > > > + else if(_IOC_NR(cmd) == AUTOFS_DEV_IOCTL_OPENMOUNT_CMD) > > > > > > > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My preference is to put the comment inside the else but ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There's another question, should the check be done in > > > > > > > > autofs_dev_ioctl_openmount() in the same way it's checked in > > > > > > > > other > > > > > > > > ioctls that need a path, such as in autofs_dev_ioctl_requester() > > > > > > > > and autofs_dev_ioctl_ismountpoint()? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For consistency I'd say it should. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > err = 0;You should just put the "_IOC_NR" directive > > > > > > > > > around > > > > > > > > > "cmd" in > > > > > > > > > the lines added to "validate_dev_ioctl" to make it work. > > > > > > > > > out: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tested and solves the issue on Linus' main git tree. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Or perhaps this (not even compile tested) patch would be better? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > autofs - fix slab out of bounds read in getname_kernel() > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The autofs subsystem does not check that the "path" parameter is > > > > > > > present for all cases where it is required when it is passed in > > > > > > > via the "param" struct. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In particular it isn't checked for the > > > > > > > AUTOFS_DEV_IOCTL_OPENMOUNT_CMD > > > > > > > ioctl command. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To solve it, modify validate_dev_ioctl() function to check that a > > > > > > > path has been provided for ioctl commands that require it. > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > fs/autofs/dev-ioctl.c | 15 +++++++-------- > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/autofs/dev-ioctl.c b/fs/autofs/dev-ioctl.c > > > > > > > index ea4ca1445ab7..61c63715c3fb 100644 > > > > > > > --- a/fs/autofs/dev-ioctl.c > > > > > > > +++ b/fs/autofs/dev-ioctl.c > > > > > > > @@ -135,6 +135,11 @@ static int validate_dev_ioctl(int cmd, struct > > > > > > > autofs_dev_ioctl *param) > > > > > > > cmd); > > > > > > > goto out; > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > + } else if (cmd == AUTOFS_DEV_IOCTL_OPENMOUNT_CMD || > > > > > > > + cmd == AUTOFS_DEV_IOCTL_REQUESTER_CMD || > > > > > > > + cmd == AUTOFS_DEV_IOCTL_ISMOUNTPOINT_CMD) { > > > > > > > + err = -EINVAL; > > > > > > > + goto out; > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > err = 0; > > > > > > > @@ -433,10 +438,7 @@ static int autofs_dev_ioctl_requester(struct > > > > > > > file > > > > > > > *fp, > > > > > > > dev_t devid; > > > > > > > int err = -ENOENT; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - if (param->size <= AUTOFS_DEV_IOCTL_SIZE) { > > > > > > > - err = -EINVAL; > > > > > > > - goto out; > > > > > > > - } > > > > > > > + /* param->path has already been checked */ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > devid = sbi->sb->s_dev; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -521,10 +523,7 @@ static int > > > > > > > autofs_dev_ioctl_ismountpoint(struct > > > > > > > file > > > > > > > *fp, > > > > > > > unsigned int devid, magic; > > > > > > > int err = -ENOENT; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - if (param->size <= AUTOFS_DEV_IOCTL_SIZE) { > > > > > > > - err = -EINVAL; > > > > > > > - goto out; > > > > > > > - } > > > > > > > + /* param->path has already been checked */ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > name = param->path; > > > > > > > type = param->ismountpoint.in.type; > > > > > > > > -- > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > Groups > > > > "syzkaller" group. > > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > > > > an > > > > email to syzkaller+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. > > > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "syzkaller" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to syzkaller+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe autofs" in
