Hi Ian, you are welcome! yes your patch is much better. You should just put the "_IOC_NR" macro around "cmd" in the lines added to "validate_dev_ioctl" to make it work. Tomas On 07/02/2018 03:42 AM, Ian Kent wrote: > On Mon, 2018-07-02 at 09:10 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: >> On Mon, 2018-07-02 at 00:04 +0200, tomas wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've looked into this issue found by Syzbot and I made a patch: >>> >>> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=d03abd8b42847f7f69b1d1d7f97208ae425b116 >>> 3 >> Umm ... oops! >> >> Thanks for looking into this Tomas. >> >>> >>> The autofs subsystem does not check that the "path" parameter is present >>> within the "param" struct passed by the userspace in case the >>> AUTOFS_DEV_IOCTL_OPENMOUNT_CMD command is passed. Indeed, it assumes a >>> path is always provided (though a path is not always present, as per how >>> the struct is defined: >>> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/include/uapi/linux/auto_dev-io >>> ct >>> l.h#L89). >>> Skipping the check provokes an oob read in "strlen", called by >>> "getname_kernel", in turn called by the autofs to assess the length of >>> the non-existing path. >>> >>> To solve it, modify the "validate_dev_ioctl" function to check also that >>> a path has been provided if the command is AUTOFS_DEV_IOCTL_OPENMOUNT_CMD. >>> >>> >>> --- b/fs/autofs/dev-ioctl.c 2018-07-01 23:10:16.059728621 +0200around >>> +++ a/fs/autofs/dev-ioctl.c 2018-07-01 23:10:24.311792133 +0200 >>> @@ -136,6 +136,9 @@ static int validate_dev_ioctl(int cmd, s >>> goto out; >>> } >>> } >>> + /* AUTOFS_DEV_IOCTL_OPENMOUNT_CMD without path */ >>> + else if(_IOC_NR(cmd) == AUTOFS_DEV_IOCTL_OPENMOUNT_CMD) >>> + return -EINVAL; >> My preference is to put the comment inside the else but ... >> >> There's another question, should the check be done in >> autofs_dev_ioctl_openmount() in the same way it's checked in other >> ioctls that need a path, such as in autofs_dev_ioctl_requester() >> and autofs_dev_ioctl_ismountpoint()? >> >> For consistency I'd say it should. >> >>> >>> err = 0;You should just put the "_IOC_NR" directive around "cmd" in the lines added to "validate_dev_ioctl" to make it work. >>> out: >>> >>> >>> Tested and solves the issue on Linus' main git tree. >>> >>> > Or perhaps this (not even compile tested) patch would be better? > > autofs - fix slab out of bounds read in getname_kernel() > > From: Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx> > > The autofs subsystem does not check that the "path" parameter is > present for all cases where it is required when it is passed in > via the "param" struct. > > In particular it isn't checked for the AUTOFS_DEV_IOCTL_OPENMOUNT_CMD > ioctl command. > > To solve it, modify validate_dev_ioctl() function to check that a > path has been provided for ioctl commands that require it. > --- > fs/autofs/dev-ioctl.c | 15 +++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/autofs/dev-ioctl.c b/fs/autofs/dev-ioctl.c > index ea4ca1445ab7..61c63715c3fb 100644 > --- a/fs/autofs/dev-ioctl.c > +++ b/fs/autofs/dev-ioctl.c > @@ -135,6 +135,11 @@ static int validate_dev_ioctl(int cmd, struct autofs_dev_ioctl *param) > cmd); > goto out; > } > + } else if (cmd == AUTOFS_DEV_IOCTL_OPENMOUNT_CMD || > + cmd == AUTOFS_DEV_IOCTL_REQUESTER_CMD || > + cmd == AUTOFS_DEV_IOCTL_ISMOUNTPOINT_CMD) { > + err = -EINVAL; > + goto out; > } > > err = 0; > @@ -433,10 +438,7 @@ static int autofs_dev_ioctl_requester(struct file *fp, > dev_t devid; > int err = -ENOENT; > > - if (param->size <= AUTOFS_DEV_IOCTL_SIZE) { > - err = -EINVAL; > - goto out; > - } > + /* param->path has already been checked */ > > devid = sbi->sb->s_dev; > > @@ -521,10 +523,7 @@ static int autofs_dev_ioctl_ismountpoint(struct file *fp, > unsigned int devid, magic; > int err = -ENOENT; > > - if (param->size <= AUTOFS_DEV_IOCTL_SIZE) { > - err = -EINVAL; > - goto out; > - } > + /* param->path has already been checked */ > > name = param->path; > type = param->ismountpoint.in.type; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe autofs" in
