> Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Yeah, the problem with that is that "autofs doesn't work if containers > > are used" is ill defined since there are use cases where it does, I > > believe. At the very least, ill defined in my view of things. Customer says: "There is no interaction between host and the conatainer. The host use only his own automount and each containers used automount in their container." I think it's a pretty clearly defined use case. And one which automount could easily support since the only requirement is that all namespaces are treated equally. But I agree that adding safeguards against cases which don't have such easily defined semantics (such as triggers from several different namespaces). I'll post updated patches. Thanks, Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe autofs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
