On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Brent Taylor <motobud@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Brent Taylor <motobud@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Brent Taylor <motobud@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> >>>> On Dec 2, 2014 11:24 PM, "Kalle Valo" <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Brent Taylor <motobud@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >>>>> >>>>> > I actually ran the wpa_supplicant with -ddddt as the parameter not >>>>> > knowing how many 'd's I could put there before I hit the limit of the >>>>> > debugging. The wpa_supplicant on the ubuntu laptop is v0.7.3. I'll >>>>> > change the -ddddt to just -dddt and re-run the test again. >>>>> >>>>> IMHO 0.7.3 is ancient. Please use something more recent. >>>> >>>> Ancient it may be, but why would it work with the ath9k chip and not >>>> the ath6kl chip? >>> >>> Because of a bug we are not aware of? ath6kl and ath9k are very >>> different drivers and 0.7.3 might have some problem which only comes >>> with ath6kl. Up to you, but I would not waste time testing on that old >>> wpasupplicant. >>> >>> -- >>> Kalle Valo >> >> Apologies for my last reply not making it through the mailing lists, I >> sent it from my phone and it was automatically formatted in HTML and >> not Plain Text. >> >> The ultimate goal is to use an Android device to communicate with my >> custom device being the Access Point. The laptop is easier to debug >> (at the moment) than an Android device. I'm currently using a Samsung >> S4 running 4.4.4 and it was not able to complete the authentication >> step either. This is when I turned to using the laptop. Any idea >> what version of the wpa_supplicant is running on Kit Kat? >> >> -- Brent Taylor > > > Here is another log capture from the device and the laptop. This time > both were using -dddt as the debug parameter to wpa_supplicant. > > Laptop wpa_supplicant Log > -- snip last log data from 2014-12-03 -- I just found out that the Samsung S4 that we are testing with has wpa_supplicant version v2.0-devel-4.2.2 which is not KitKat, but Jelly Bean. Does anyone know if the logging can be turned on without rooting the phone? -- Brent Taylor _______________________________________________ ath6kl mailing list ath6kl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath6kl
