Brent Taylor <motobud@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Dec 2, 2014 11:24 PM, "Kalle Valo" <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Brent Taylor <motobud@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > I actually ran the wpa_supplicant with -ddddt as the parameter not >> > knowing how many 'd's I could put there before I hit the limit of the >> > debugging. The wpa_supplicant on the ubuntu laptop is v0.7.3. I'll >> > change the -ddddt to just -dddt and re-run the test again. >> >> IMHO 0.7.3 is ancient. Please use something more recent. > > Ancient it may be, but why would it work with the ath9k chip and not > the ath6kl chip? Because of a bug we are not aware of? ath6kl and ath9k are very different drivers and 0.7.3 might have some problem which only comes with ath6kl. Up to you, but I would not waste time testing on that old wpasupplicant. -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath6kl mailing list ath6kl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath6kl