Re: Picking up development of dmraid

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,
  Any update on whether the checksum error has been fixed for VIA chipsets?


Regards
David



On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Ian Stakenvicius, Aerobiology Research <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 18/07/12 03:59 PM, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:20:10AM +0200, Mark-Willem Jansen wrote:
>> also implement more partition tables, starting with GPT.
>
> What advantage would dmraid have over kpartx which already does this?
>

I would have concerns on this one too -- imo dmraid should just handle
what it does now, which is to parse the raid metadata and configure the
device-mapper appropriately.  Dmraid shouldn't take over for kpartx (or
whatever other tool handles GPT), but if there is a conflict which is
keeping dmraid or kpartx from doing its job with GPT partitions then
this should be resolved.

_______________________________________________
Ataraid-list mailing list
Ataraid-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ataraid-list

_______________________________________________
Ataraid-list mailing list
Ataraid-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ataraid-list

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Device Mapper]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Kernel]     [Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [Yosemite Campgrounds]     [AMD 64]

  Powered by Linux