On 18/07/12 03:59 PM, Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:20:10AM +0200, Mark-Willem Jansen wrote: >> also implement more partition tables, starting with GPT. > > What advantage would dmraid have over kpartx which already does this? > I would have concerns on this one too -- imo dmraid should just handle what it does now, which is to parse the raid metadata and configure the device-mapper appropriately. Dmraid shouldn't take over for kpartx (or whatever other tool handles GPT), but if there is a conflict which is keeping dmraid or kpartx from doing its job with GPT partitions then this should be resolved. _______________________________________________ Ataraid-list mailing list Ataraid-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ataraid-list
