paul moore (paulm2012@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > Hmmm, now that is interesting. The only thing that was changed in the > handleing of primary partitions was a check to see if the partition ran > off the end of the disk and whether it has non-zero start and length > logical block addresses. Maybe M$ doing some kind of address rollover or > negitive addressing, not sure yet. I don't know either. I thought my disk was partitioned using cfdisk, but maybe it wasn't. Tho, it's formatted using tools from Microsoft. > Are you a coder? It would be very interresting if you could send a > tarballed dd of the first block of the first drive to the mailing list > so I can see which end is up. I guess you could call me a coder, but I don't understand anything about the code for dmraid -- sorry if I can't be of much help! Tho, I've tried to create a tarball with the first block of /dev/hde. Sorry for sending the file to the list, but I guess that's the wanted solution! > In an earlier message I asked you if you had done an mkfs, well that > was in error. It should have been format. I sent out a correction, but > it never reached the list. No, I haven't done that! > Do you Yahoo!? No, sorry not that either. :) Cheers, Örjan
Attachment:
orange-dd.tar.gz
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
