Yes, ataraid and promise proprietary raid both do not support that failsafe feature. Hopefully RedHat people will someday integrate such features of md raid into ataraid. On 22 Jan 2003, Johann Uhrmann wrote: > On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 19:47, Marcin wrote: > > > I know I _should_, but in case of failure of one drive, ataraid become > > unusable (kernel oopsses). [...] > > Could someone please verify that kernel oopses occur when one drive on a > Promise FT-133 fails? > If that was true, then the chance of a system failure would be doubled > by the raid instead of being reduced, right? > > Therefore, a single IDE disk would be more failsafe than a promise raid. > I can hardly believe that (well, on the other hand - it's Promise...). > > Thanks, > > Hans > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ataraid-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ataraid-list >
