Re: question about hardware raid 1 (IDE)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Innercity Films wrote:

> The following are cards that I personally use w/ Linux for HW raid:
> 
> * 3ware Escalade series (6xxx, 7xxx)
> * Adaptec 2400a
> 
> - Stu

I think beter are scsi based cards... :) 

(ok with 3ware escalade 7850 ide-HW-raid card & 160GB maxtor ide disks you
can build 1.1TB raid5 server less than 5000USD.) 
(SCSI based 1.1TB server cost x times more... x >> 3)
(Have anybody personal experience with 3ware and big (>700GB) raid5
server?) 

So many peole are confused with these non hardware raid promise &
higpoint drivers and them properties. So maybe is time to write FAQ ?

1. "ATA-RAID" linux kernel driver is devoloped to enable windows & linux
    can access same array. If you don't need windows, you have not
    reason to use ATA-RAID driver. (feel free to testing) 

2. ATA-RAID driver raid1 is not fault tolerant.
   - don't use ATA-RAID driver in production servers etc...
    
3. ATA-RAID driver is software raid.

4. If you need raid and use only linux, use linux software raid or buy
   hardware raid controller. If you think buy HW-raid controller and want
   still use ide disk, 3ware and adaptec is likely working...

-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
    
                    ****  Eerin Rosenström          ****
                    **    Servinmaijantie 12 F 77     **
                    **    02150 Espoo                 **
                    **    p. +358 9 4682997           **
                    ****  p.+358 40 5205030         ****

-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Device Mapper]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Kernel]     [Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [Yosemite Campgrounds]     [AMD 64]

  Powered by Linux