Re: software raid X controler raid

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



, why are there so many MOBO w/ RAID onboard? How would one (performance) benefit from using a RAID 0 controler onboard in a Linux system?

Could you point me to a benchmark or comparison between plain software RAID and RAID using onboard controler (HPT, PRomisse, etc)??

thanks for your attention,


AMD 1.2, ASUS A7V133,"Promise Fasttrack 100" onboard controller (PDC 20265) in RAID0, 64k, using the ataraid driver (0.03beta), and two MAXTOR 7200rpm disks with 2MB cache


Here are my results. They are very poor. I wouldn't recommend the same stuff.


radafuk@r2d2:~$ /usr/sbin/bonnie++ -s 744
Writing with putc()...done
Writing intelligently...done
Rewriting...done
Reading with getc()...done
Reading intelligently...done
start 'em...done...done...done...
Create files in sequential order...done.
Stat files in sequential order...done.
Delete files in sequential order...done.
Create files in random order...done.
Stat files in random order...done.
Delete files in random order...done.
Version 1.02b ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
r2d2 744M 8082 80 30880 14 14828 8 9018 93 29054 9 239.3 0
------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
-Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
16 1284 93 +++++ +++ +++++ +++ 1232 93 +++++ +++ 2550 91
r2d2,744M,8082,80,30880,14,14828,8,9018,93,29054,9,239.3,0,16,1284,93,+++++,+++,



Anyone has results with software-RAID?







[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Device Mapper]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Kernel]     [Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [Yosemite Campgrounds]     [AMD 64]

  Powered by Linux