Re: Slashdot Article.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: <ataraid-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Slashdot Article.
From: "Mike Tharp" <chexmeex@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 13:00:58 -0500
Delivered-to: ataraid-list@listman.redhat.com
References: <000d01c14425$ce563740$0300a8c0@krusty> <20010923075229.A31714@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <003101c145aa$3acfd360$0300a8c0@krusty> <000b01c145b4$b2a1c2e0$0300a8c0@krusty> <20010925080213.B24110@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <004301c14603$e2e6d770$2ac2d18d@bobble>

> Ummm.  Yah.  You seen that yet, Arjan?
> 
> Seems like somone should check sources before posting... I heard it was
> based on someones work... Hrm. I'm just curious as to what is up.

http://slashdot.org/bsd/01/09/24/1432223.shtml

References:
- 2.4.9-ac9, problems
  - From: Richard Wood
- Re: 2.4.9-ac9, problems
  - From: Arjan van de Ven
- Re: 2.4.9-ac9, problems
  - From: Richard Wood
- Re: 2.4.9-ac9, problems
  - From: Richard Wood
- Re: 2.4.9-ac9, problems
  - From: Arjan van de Ven
- Slashdot Article.
  - From: Gabriel Friedmann

Prev by Date: Slashdot Article.
Next by Date: Re: Slashdot Article.
Previous by thread: Slashdot Article.
Next by thread: Re: Slashdot Article.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux Device Mapper] [Linux IDE] [Linux SCSI] [Kernel] [Linux Books] [Linux Admin] [GFS] [RPM] [Yosemite Campgrounds] [AMD 64]

Powered by Linux