Looking for advice in CIC numbering for E1 upgrade

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 9:45 AM, bipin singh <bipinraghuvanshi at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi ,
> If you have single point code (adjpointcode) then it's ok . Also you try
> single sigchan for all 8 port.
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 6:48 AM, Luis Marcelo <mbaldi at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey guys,
>> I wanted to get some advice for an upgrade we have in mind:
>> Scenario: We have 1 server with 2xA104d Sangoma cards (8E1s total) Our
>> setup has 1 sig chan per card (chans 16 and 140) . Right now we rarely use
>> more than 3 E1s but we are expecting a major traffic increase in the
>> following days so we got ourselves another server with identical hardware.
>>
>> these are the config files:
>>
>> *system.conf:*
>>
>> loadzone=us
>> defaultzone=us
>>
>> #Sangoma A104 port 1 [slot:1 bus:13 span:1] <wanpipe1>
>> span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3
>> bchan=1-15,17-31
>> mtp2=16
>>
>> #Sangoma A104 port 2 [slot:1 bus:13 span:2] <wanpipe2>
>> span=2,2,0,ccs,hdb3
>> bchan=32-62
>>
>> #Sangoma A104 port 3 [slot:1 bus:13 span:3] <wanpipe3>
>> span=3,3,0,ccs,hdb3
>> bchan=63-93
>>
>> #Sangoma A104 port 4 [slot:1 bus:13 span:4] <wanpipe4>
>> span=4,4,0,ccs,hdb3
>> bchan=94-124
>>
>> #Sangoma A104 port 1 [slot:4 bus:15 span:5] <wanpipe5>
>> span=5,5,0,ccs,hdb3
>> bchan=125-139,141-155
>> mtp2=140
>>
>> #Sangoma A104 port 2 [slot:4 bus:15 span:6] <wanpipe6>
>> span=6,6,0,ccs,hdb3
>> bchan=156-186
>>
>> #Sangoma A104 port 3 [slot:4 bus:15 span:7] <wanpipe7>
>> span=7,7,0,ccs,hdb3
>> bchan=187-217
>>
>> #Sangoma A104 port 4 [slot:4 bus:15 span:8] <wanpipe8>
>> span=8,8,0,ccs,hdb3
>> bchan=218-248
>>
>> *chan_dahdi.conf:*
>>
>> [trunkgroups]
>>
>> [channels]
>> context=ctx1
>> language=en
>> usecallerid=yes
>> hidecallerid=no
>> callwaiting=yes
>> usecallingpres=yes
>> callwaitingcallerid=yes
>> threewaycalling=yes
>> transfer=yes
>> canpark=yes
>> cancallforward=yes
>> callreturn=yes
>> relaxdtmf=yes
>> rxgain=0.0
>> txgain=0.0
>> group=1
>> callgroup=1
>> pickupgroup=1
>> immediate=no
>>
>> networkindicator=National
>> ss7_called_nai=National ;dynamic
>> ss7_calling_nai=National ;dynamic
>> ss7_internationalprefix =
>> ss7_nationalprefix =
>> signalling = ss7
>> ss7type = itu
>> linkset = 1
>> pointcode = 200
>> adjpointcode = 300
>> defaultdpc = 300
>> slc=0
>>
>> ;Sangoma A104 port 1 [slot:1 bus:13 span:1] <wanpipe1>
>> cicbeginswith = 1
>> channel => 1-15
>> cicbeginswith = 17
>> channel => 17-31
>> sigchan = 16
>>
>> ;Sangoma A104 port 2 [slot:1 bus:13 span:2] <wanpipe2>
>> cicbeginswith = 33
>> channel => 32-62
>>
>> ;Sangoma A104 port 3 [slot:1 bus:13 span:3] <wanpipe3>
>> cicbeginswith = 65
>> channel => 63-93
>>
>> ;Sangoma A104 port 4 [slot:1 bus:13 span:4] <wanpipe4>
>> cicbeginswith = 97
>> channel => 94-124
>>
>>  ;Sangoma A104 port 1 [slot:4 bus:15 span:5] <wanpipe5>
>> cicbeginswith = 129
>> channel => 125-139
>> cicbeginswith = 145
>> channel => 141-155
>> sigchan = 140
>>
>> ;Sangoma A104 port 2 [slot:4 bus:15 span:6] <wanpipe6>
>> cicbeginswith = 161
>> channel => 156-186
>>
>> ;Sangoma A104 port 3 [slot:4 bus:15 span:7] <wanpipe7>
>> cicbeginswith = 193
>> channel => 187-217
>>
>> ;Sangoma A104 port 4 [slot:4 bus:15 span:8] <wanpipe8>
>> cicbeginswith = 225
>> channel => 218-248
>>
>> Now, two questions:
>>
>> 1. It seems to me that I should configure the 2nd server almost identical
>> to the first except the CIC numbering, wich should now start a CIC 249,
>> Something like this:
>>
>> ;span1
>> cicbeginswith = 249
>> channel => 1-15
>> cicbeginswith = 265
>> channel => 17-31
>> sigchan = 16
>>
>> ;span2
>> cicbeginswith = 281
>> channel => 32-62
>>
>> ;span3
>> cicbeginswith = 313
>> channel => 63-93
>>
>> ;span4
>> cicbeginswith = 345
>> channel => 94-124
>>
>> ;span5
>> cicbeginswith = 377
>> channel => 125-139
>> cicbeginswith = 393
>> channel => 141-155
>> sigchan = 140
>>
>> ;span6
>> cicbeginswith = 409
>> channel => 156-186
>>
>> ;span7
>> cicbeginswith = 441
>> channel => 187-217
>>
>> ;span8
>> cicbeginswith = 473
>> channel => 218-248
>>
>> is this correct?
>>
>> 2. Would it be at all possible for both servers to handle half the
>> traffic at all times? (right now the switch assigns the first call to CIC
>> 248, the 2nd to 247 an so on) should we assign say CIC 248 to server 1 and
>> 247 to server2?
>>
>> I'm using Asterisk1.6.0.20, dahdi 2.5.0.2 and libss7-1.0.2
>> Also the sangoma drivers are Wanpipe 3.5.24
>>
>> thanks in advance!
>>
>> --
>> _____________________________________________________________________
>> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>>
>> asterisk-ss7 mailing list
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ss7
>>
>
>
>
> --
> BIPIN RAGHUVANSHI
> OPERATION HEAD
> ASTERISK (DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH)
> WWW.EHORIZONS.IN
> 011-32323262
> 011-46334633
>



-- 
IT DESK
www.essencekey.com
info at essencekey.com
Contact: +91-1164722856
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-ss7/attachments/20131024/cdf87416/attachment.html>


[Index of Archives]     [Asterisk App Development]     [PJ SIP]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [IETF Sipping]     [Info Cyrus]     [ALSA User]     [Fedora Linux Users]     [Linux SCTP]     [DCCP]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Asterisk Books]

  Powered by Linux