Dear Sirs, Just a correction: The commercial support to Chan SS7 is now being done by the company Netfors. We offer premium support at 1750 Euro per year. Also we help with large installations and customised adaptions of Chan SS7, e.g. Ansi. Best regards, Esben Sj?lborg Jensen Sales and marketing manager Mobile: +45 2022 5773 esj at netfors.com G-talk: esj at netfors.com Skype: esbenjen www.netfors.com On Saturday 30 April 2011 00:34:04 Krzysztof Drewicz wrote: > 2011/4/30 Anita Hall <anita.hall at simmortel.com> > > > Hi > > > > I am running a massive 100 E1 lines over SS7, distributed over 7 boxes > > with only 2 signaling links. > > > > I am trying to get mtp3d and chan_ss7 work for 2 signaling links across 7 > > boxes. > > 100 E1 should work with 2 signalling links, as long you don't have to many > CPS. > But, 100 / 7 ~= 15 E1 per box, i think its too much. try to narrow down > this. > some 'years' ago i've faced similar problem, and well used TDM gateway with > many E1s and DSP on board. Price level of such gateways is when comparing > to 25 Digium's TE400P + 25 good servers, at least power consumption beats > you. > > Anyway, the chan_ss7 is comericial product from Dicea, you could obtain > help there? > try simple think, is debian a host name put in /etc/hosts? > is a port 12000 realy open? > mtp3_connect_socket: Could not connect to hostname/IP address 'debian', > port '12000' > ssh to host debian, and run netstat, why you bring firewall level & nmap > when you are not sure if some process is really running on that host and it > has opened a tcp socket? > > the log: > > Apr 30 03:22:35 [ERROR] mtp3io.c:84 setup_socket Cannot bind receiver > socket, errno=98: Address already in use > > really says that shometing has already used this port, so netstat -a -n | > grep 12000 for a start, ok?
|