Hi, Have you tried Attila's Version? https://observer.router.hu/repos_pub/libss7/trunk/ We are using it in production in some companies. But we implemented all SS7 stuff in asterisk 1.4 Asterisk 1.4 Digium Boards Dahdi It?s super stable and working fine with no errors for more than 6 months now. Prado -----Mensagem original----- De: asterisk-ss7-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-ss7-bounces at lists.digium.com] Em nome de Krzysztof Drewicz Enviada em: quinta-feira, 17 de mar?o de 2011 10:27 Para: asterisk-ss7 at lists.digium.com Assunto: Re: [asterisk-ss7] Most stable SS7 Implementation WAS: facing problem with libss7 2011/3/17 Jeremy Parr <jeremyparr at gmail.com>: > > On that note, which flavour of SS7 driver provides the best support > and stability. It appears that Sangoma have their own SS7 > implementation, as does Digium. Well, Sangoma's libss7 does not have HA capability when you want to split: one Signalling Point of your * (many CICs and at least two signaling TS) on different hardware PC, so Sangoma's LIBSS7 is no good for me. The slides from Sangoma, look the very same as they have been 3 years ago. -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-ss7 mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ss7 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 4989 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-ss7/attachments/20110317/f11d552c/attachment.bin>
|