What is the difference of Attila's version compared to the Digitum tree? /Sverker > -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-ss7-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-ss7- > bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Rafael Prado Rocchi > Sent: den 17 mars 2011 8:54 > To: asterisk-ss7 at lists.digium.com > Subject: [asterisk-ss7] RES: Most stable SS7 Implementation WAS: facing > problem with libss7 > > Hi, > Have you tried Attila's Version? > https://observer.router.hu/repos_pub/libss7/trunk/ > > We are using it in production in some companies. > But we implemented all SS7 stuff in asterisk 1.4 > > > Asterisk 1.4 > Digium Boards > Dahdi > > It?s super stable and working fine with no errors for more than 6 > months now. > > > Prado > > > > -----Mensagem original----- > De: asterisk-ss7-bounces at lists.digium.com > [mailto:asterisk-ss7-bounces at lists.digium.com] Em nome de Krzysztof > Drewicz Enviada em: quinta-feira, 17 de mar?o de 2011 10:27 > Para: asterisk-ss7 at lists.digium.com > Assunto: Re: [asterisk-ss7] Most stable SS7 Implementation WAS: facing > problem with libss7 > > 2011/3/17 Jeremy Parr <jeremyparr at gmail.com>: > > > > > On that note, which flavour of SS7 driver provides the best support > > and stability. It appears that Sangoma have their own SS7 > > implementation, as does Digium. > > Well, Sangoma's libss7 does not have HA capability when you want to > split: one Signalling Point of your * (many CICs and at least two > signaling > TS) on different hardware PC, so Sangoma's LIBSS7 is no good for me. > The slides from Sangoma, look the very same as they have been > 3 years ago. > > -- > _____________________________________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > > asterisk-ss7 mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ss7
|