A little extra question, which should be interesting for many of us, how stable is the driver? cound it be used in production, or it's highly untested, pre-alpha, etc? On 13 August 2006 04:00, Matthew Fredrickson wrote: > On Aug 12, 2006, at 5:45 AM, Anton wrote: > > Great to hear Matthew! > > > > for me chan_ss7 works OK (i do not say great, since > > audoi lost trouble still there). ANSI part would be > > great, since than US testers, and (hopefully) > > contributors would join. And I'm just happy to see that > > now we have two SS7 drivers available for Asterisk! > > Getting Hardware support is also a great thing, but it > > would be nice to not stick with single hardware vendor > > ;) > > > > Also the question, if you don't mind, what ISUP > > functionality libss7 does have in comparision to > > chan_ss7? I mean how featurefull is it? > > I'm not terribly familiar with the ISUP functionality of > chan_ss7 and how it compares to libss7 (I've been trying > to keep myself from being influenced from it). I think > that it supports more message types than mine does right > now, although mine support all the basic messages (plus > a few more) for doing call setup and teardown. I'm > working on implementing continuity test support right > now, and I think I'll probably do suspend/resume after > this. > > Matthew Fredrickson > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > asterisk-ss7 mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ss7
|