On Aug 12, 2006, at 5:45 AM, Anton wrote: > Great to hear Matthew! > > for me chan_ss7 works OK (i do not say great, since audoi > lost trouble still there). ANSI part would be great, since > than US testers, and (hopefully) contributors would join. > And I'm just happy to see that now we have two SS7 drivers > available for Asterisk! Getting Hardware support is also a > great thing, but it would be nice to not stick with single > hardware vendor ;) > > Also the question, if you don't mind, what ISUP > functionality libss7 does have in comparision to chan_ss7? > I mean how featurefull is it? I'm not terribly familiar with the ISUP functionality of chan_ss7 and how it compares to libss7 (I've been trying to keep myself from being influenced from it). I think that it supports more message types than mine does right now, although mine support all the basic messages (plus a few more) for doing call setup and teardown. I'm working on implementing continuity test support right now, and I think I'll probably do suspend/resume after this. Matthew Fredrickson
|