Re: ARI in production

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, 
A number of us are looking at scalability at the moment for Asterisk ARI (multi node etc), Paul Belanger has created a solution to work with Python and his ARI framework (https://github.com/kickstandproject/python-ari) , and I am currently investigating options for AsterNET.ARI (https://asternetari.codeplex.com/) which is a .NET framework for Asterisk ARI.

ARI itself is of course still in development and improvements and features are being added all the time. Myself (skrusty) and Paul (pabelanger) are both on IRC and I am sure he, as I would be happy to discuss what we've done in this area so far.

Ben

Damir Wrote:
Hi All,

I am new to this mailing list and maybe this question was asked before. Sorry if that is the case.

I am starting a new greenfield project and I am strongly considering using ARI. I have just started learning about ARI.

The project itself is going to be .NET based and have features like IVR, voicemail management, call routing etc.

I plan to use ARI for as much as the API provides (and I have a feeling that it will cover most of my needs) however I am not sure about its stability/scalability, I know that version 12 is not a long term release but it is still an official release.

Do you think that ARI is considerably stable/scalable ( for handling ~200 simultaneous calls) so that I can use it in production? 

Regards,
Damir
_______________________________________________
asterisk-app-dev mailing list
asterisk-app-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.digium.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-app-dev





[Index of Archives]     [Asterisk SS7]     [Asterisk Announcements]     [Asterisk Users]     [PJ SIP]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux