On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Paul Belanger <paul.belanger at polybeacon.com > wrote: > On to the next topic :D > > So, Josh has a patch up on reviewboard[1] that adds indication support > to /channels. After looking at the patch, it looks like we 2 basic > ways of controlling a channel with /channel/:id > > Either you can use: > > /answer > /hold > > or you can use: > > /indicate?name=busy > > For the sake consistency I'd like to see us pick one. I can go either > way, but the more I think about it > > /indicate?name=answer > /indicate?name=hold > /indicate?name=busy > > would give us a cleaner API for channels. > > Thoughts? > > [1] https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2916/ > > -- > Paul Belanger | PolyBeacon, Inc. > Jabber: paul.belanger at polybeacon.com | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode) > Github: https://github.com/pabelanger | Twitter: > https://twitter.com/pabelanger > > _______________________________________________ > asterisk-app-dev mailing list > asterisk-app-dev at lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-app-dev > Can you explain what exactly is changing? with http methods and uris and what exactly they do, I'm a little lost on what these do -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-app-dev/attachments/20131019/434e52af/attachment-0001.html>
