Re: Jami: is JACK implemented?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi riveravaldez,

I'm not sure either if this belongs to this list, but since it's been quite calm in recent times, I try to provide a complet e answer.

Am 11.02.21 um 10:43 schrieb riveravaldez via arch-proaudio:
Hi, sorry if this is not the place to ask.

I've been trying Jami for video-calls between a couple of laptops with
Arch and Debian Testing.
I've seen that in Arch one can choose JACK as audio server, which is *awesome*.
But when tried to connect its ports (in the 'Connections' window of
qjackctl) I'd found myself unable to. Is this how it's supposed to be
working right now?
No, it's not. Pulseaudio is supposed to be for desktop usage and JACK is for low-latency audio, mainly used in multimedia production and studios.
I mean: is JACK implemented/usable, at what extent?
Sure, it's completely usable, but the application has to support it! [1]
Or what should I do to use Jami over JACK instead of PulseAudio?,
without PA-bridge, just simple plain JACK.

Jami doesn't seem to support JACK, so you won't be able to use it with "plain" JACK

As a workaround, you may have a look at pipewire, which is able to combine Pulseaudio and JACK with low latencies [2]


Thanks a lot in advance for any info. Best regards!

You're always welcome

Best regards


Oliver


[1] https://jackaudio.org/applications/

[2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PipeWire




[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux