Re: About AUR accreditation policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



El lun, 21-10-2024 a las 19:07 +0200, Martin Rys escribió:
> Based on what has been said in this thread, I don't think so.
> They did not take maintainership over an existing PKGBUILD, they
> wrote
> a new one from scratch, and disabled the AUR repo, as is custom when
> software already exists in official repos.

That answer would validate my previous statement:

"By the same rule of thumb if you adopt a package in the AUR and
rewrite the PKGBUILD you should not credit the previous maintainer(s)."

Which, from my point of view, is unfair to the previous maintainer(s).

El mar, 22-10-2024 a las 12:02 +0800, Ling Yang(杨令) escribió:
> I believe the community should encourage members to contribute and
> express gratitude to those contributors, while also recording their
> contributions in some way.

This is exactly what I am talking about, recognizing people's work.

Greetings.

-- 
Óscar García Amor | ogarcia at moire.org | http://ogarcia.me

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux