Re: About AUR accreditation policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



El sáb, 19-10-2024 a las 12:15 +0000, Doug Newgard escribió:
> It doesn't look like they used your PKGBUILD at all, there's nothing
> there for you to be credited for.

By the same rule of thumb if you adopt a package in the AUR and rewrite
the PKGBUILD you should not credit the previous maintainers. This
conflicts with what the guide says[1], doesn't it?

I personally have adopted packages, completely rewritten PKGBUILD and
kept the names before me out of respect for their work.

I guess in the end it depends on the individual and the kind of person
you are.

Greetings.

[1]:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines#Rules_of_submission

-- 
Óscar García Amor | ogarcia at moire.org | http://ogarcia.me

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux