On 2024-07-27 at 02:53:14 -0500, "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 7/27/24 12:41 AM, İsmail Arılık wrote: > > > grep '^processor\|^cpu MHz' /proc/cpuinfo > > > > processor : 0 > > cpu MHz : 400.000 > > processor : 1 > > cpu MHz : 400.000 > > processor : 2 > > cpu MHz : 400.000 > > processor : 3 > > cpu MHz : 400.000 > > processor : 4 > > cpu MHz : 851.190 > > processor : 5 > > cpu MHz : 400.000 > > processor : 6 > > cpu MHz : 400.000 > > processor : 7 > > cpu MHz : 400.000 > > processor : 8 > > cpu MHz : 1083.960 > > processor : 9 > > cpu MHz : 400.000 > > processor : 10 > > cpu MHz : 1006.537 > > processor : 11 > > cpu MHz : 400.000 > > processor : 12 > > cpu MHz : 942.949 > > processor : 13 > > cpu MHz : 968.000 > > processor : 14 > > cpu MHz : 1361.782 > > processor : 15 > > cpu MHz : 1400.012 > > processor : 16 > > cpu MHz : 400.000 > > processor : 17 > > cpu MHz : 400.000 > > processor : 18 > > cpu MHz : 400.000 > > processor : 19 > > cpu MHz : 1384.733 > > > > And I just re-opened the lid to check for activity on my post. > > Honestly, those do not look bad. You have 12 cores at dead-idle (400MHz) and > 8 cores at 1400MHz or less. I'm no 12th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) expert, but > that seems reasonable for just opening up the lid and the various processes > coming back to life. Okay, maybe not too bad. > A 24-core laptop -- what's the world coming to :) No, just 20, but I agree with your sentiment. :-) 6 performance cores, each with hyperthreading, so 2 cores each. 8 efficiency cores, no hyperthreading, for a total of 20. I try not to replace my computer too often, but the pattern has always been to buy something bigger than I really need. > Good luck with your issue. Maybe others have more than a guess -- but that's > all I've got for you. Thanks. Regards, Dan
