On 24/05/07 10:07AM, u34@xxxxxxx wrote: > 1) Any point opening a bug about pacman --ask option not documented? > [https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=35901](https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=35901) > is from 2007. No, this is very much wanted this way, see for example one of the Maintainers comments here: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues/60#note_131515 > 2) Quoting https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman > Please also check open issues in our [historical bug tracker](https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=3) before opening a new issue here. > Shouldn't the url point to the new archive? Yes, this is outdated as the bugtracker currently is a static site and not easily searchable as the builtin search function has been remove when the site was made static. I have created [a searchable version][0] some time ago which you can access via GitLab for the Bug Wrangler team. Pacman itself is also aware of any leftover open bugs on the old bugtracker, feel free to check the [related issue][1] and help out there! Cheers, gromit [0]: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/gromit/bugs-archive-searchable [1]: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues/68
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
