> I'm not exactly what you're looking for, from Emacs or from the mailing > list. >From Emacs, to have as many functionalities working as possible with the least trade-offs and the least bugs and issues as possible. >From mailing list, to tell me what Emacs they use and if they have some specific reason to choose it over others. > Is an archaic UI good or bad? It's not an objective matter. I personally saw GNUStep UI to be very much appealing. But it's not widely seen the same by other people. > Is drag-n-drop required? Not *Required*, of course. I didn't have the opportunity to try it. > I turn off the toolbars and menubars. I do turn off tool/menu/scroll bars all together anyway. I even turn off the title bar of the frame decoration. (fossdd@xxxxxxxxxx) <mailto:fossdd@xxxxxxxxxx>> I used `emacs-wayland` for a while instead of Emacs, because I already use a Wayland compositor I installed the `emacs-wayland` as the first Emacs of my life. Since my whole setup was pure Wayland. But I really need that daemon to stay awake all the time and do not crash when switching desktops, ttys, users and login/logouts. It and many other things appear to not work, and probably will never work, with GTK toolkit of Emacs. (aaronliu0130@xxxxxxxxx)> If you've already tried all of them, I don't know what to say. The Arch-maintained repo sounds like the stablest, and "emacs-wayland - with native compilation and PGTK enabled." sounds very appealing to me. That's so enlightening of you, Aaron. ;) -- Best Regards, Abraham Sent with Tutanota; https://tuta.com
