Re: Packaging wireguard re-resolve DNS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



I can imagine you could try to push for it being included with
wireguard-tools, since it provides the scripts being run, or use a
configuration management tool like Ansible to push unit files into
your machine, which could also make sure the unit is enabled too.

Martin

On Sat, Aug 5, 2023 at 8:38 PM LuKaRo <lists@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> wireguard users need to manually re-resolve the DNS when using endpoints
> with changing IPs. The wiki page lists an example solution using a
> systemd timer[0]. I like that solution a lot and use it heavily on
> multiple machines, and as I prefer to have system files managed by
> pacman instead of manually creating them, I created an AUR package for that.
>
> Today I set up another machine using that package, and I thought, why
> not push the package to the public, so others can use it as well. Of
> course, you can as well just copy-paste the example on the wiki page,
> but I guess there are more people out there who prefer having system
> files managed by pacman instead of manually creating them. Its easier,
> after all.
>
> However, less than an hour after pushing my package to the AUR and
> mentioning it in the wiki, the change was reverted and a deletion
> request was filed with the comment
>
>  > useless package which literally just copy-pastes the units from the wiki
>
> Yes, that's right, it doesn't need to do more than that, because the
> example on the wiki works great, no need to change that. However, I
> still think it adheres to the AUR submission guidelines, as I can
> imagine I'm not the only one who prefers installing an AUR package over
> copying file contents from the wiki.
>
> What do you think? Is this really a useless package? Then go ahead,
> delete it. But I'm not sure if that's the prevalent opinion, or if there
> are others like me that like seeing things like that on the AUR, that
> make your life easier. So at least I wanted to raise the discussion.
>
> Would love to hear your input,
>
> lukaro
>
> [0]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/WireGuard#Endpoint_with_changing_IP
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux