Re: Qwt is currently built with Qt5 - should I mark the package as out-of-date?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wed, 29 Mar 2023, Peyton Murray wrote:

Hi all,

Hi Peyton,

Sorry if this is a naive question, but qwt is currently being built with
Qt5, which is nearing end-of-life, while Qt6 has been out for a while. I'd
like for qwt to be built with Qt6, but I'm not sure if this means the
package is out-of-date strictly speaking, so I figured I'd ask here before
marking the package as such. What's the right way to deal with this?

Personally, I would rather open a bug for this. Reasons:

* if there are any obstacles regarding building with Qt6, a bug is more appropriate to bundle issues, discussions, efforts, ...

* technically speaking, the package is not outdated (yet)

* If for whatever reason qt5 got removed from the repositories and the package still was not rebuilt, it would *definitely* be a bug.

* If for whatever reason, you're wrong, the maintainer can close your bug and tell you (and everyone else), what's wrong, in the reason.


Best,
- Peyton

regards,
Erich



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux