Re: `base` group replaced by mandatory `base` package - manual intervention required

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Op vr 11 okt. 2019 17:34 schreef William Bevans via arch-general <
arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> I agree with you, I think having two base packages works well as it will
> help people who want an small container install but also people who just
> want a normal install.
>

People using containers should be using a specific set of packages,
probably without any "base" groups, preferably installed by $automation
system.

Or exactly the other way around with a (container)metapackage for
$webserver/rdbms/whatever (where the metapackage contains all *required*
packages and nothing else.


Mvg, Guus



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux