Re: Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 13 May 2018 at 20:11, Neven Sajko <nsajko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I do agree that using md5 is absurd, ...

To clarify, md5 *is* unsecure and is even slower or not significantly
faster than hashes from the Keccak and BLAKE2 families; using
signatures would be a plus but signatures are not an argument for md5.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux