Re: Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: leonid.isaev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs
From: Neven Sajko via arch-general <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 21:30:51 +0200
Cc: Neven Sajko <nsajko@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20180509045406.GC19763@takahe.colorado.edu>
Reply-to: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I would just like to note that SHA-2 hashes are inferior to Keccak and
to BLAKE2. So better not to spend effort migrating to SHA-2.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs
  - From: Leonid Isaev via arch-general

References:
- Re: Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs
  - From: Leonid Isaev via arch-general
- Re: Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs
  - From: Eli Schwartz via arch-general
- Re: Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs
  - From: Leonid Isaev via arch-general
- Re: Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs
  - From: Eli Schwartz via arch-general
- Re: Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs
  - From: Leonid Isaev via arch-general

Prev by Date: Re: Missing rc-local.service
Next by Date: Re: Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs
Previous by thread: Re: Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs
Next by thread: Re: Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux