Re: Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Op do 10 mei 2018 01:26 schreef Leonid Isaev via arch-general <
arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 09:30:51PM +0200, Neven Sajko wrote:
> > I would just like to note that SHA-2 hashes are inferior to Keccak and
> > to BLAKE2. So better not to spend effort migrating to SHA-2.
>
> Strength of various SHA hashes is a different topic. My only point was that
> relying on md5 these days is like having no hashes at all or using the
> source
> filename as a hash...
>

Which is (still) pretty much the point of these hashes. With pacman these
are *not* very important.

The hashes are there for a quick check if the download is complete.
Integrity is a job for PGP.



Mvg, Guus Snijders

>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux