On 3/16/18, Jelle van der Waa <jelle@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 03/15/18 at 09:29pm, Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote: >> On 3/15/18, Eli Schwartz via arch-general <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> > Good news, I guess, is that we will almost certainly switch to bugzilla >> > as soon as Harmony brings stable psgi support (Soon™). >> >> Harmony? >> PSGI? >> >> I like Bugzilla's features, and I don't use arch's tracker enough to have >> a voice, or maintain it to have a say, but I would still like to provide >> an opinion. It's just an opinion. Having used large bugzilla >> installations >> like mozilla.org, kernel.org, freedesktop.org, it doesn't look like >> Bugzilla >> can be fast. I've found Mantis and to some extend Redmine to be fast and >> lean trackers. These may or may not suit Arch's needs, and I still have >> hope Bugzilla will at some point become snappy. >> >> Just an opinion based on experience, the arch admins/devs will know why >> bugzilla is the right choice. I trust them. > > Please don't de-rail the thread. (Obviously the Arch devs also want a > performing bugtracker, but Flyspray has to go either way) Sorry about that. I let my pain of disappointing bugzilla performance speak in the wrong context. Are the Arch devs looking for input on this in some ticket/forum? Like I said, I don't use it enough to care deeply, but I'm happy to provide experience report if needed.
