Re: gcc broken - Arch specific, applying optimization incorrectly - may explain unexplained problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 03/15/18 at 09:29pm, Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote:
> On 3/15/18, Eli Schwartz via arch-general <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Good news, I guess, is that we will almost certainly switch to bugzilla
> > as soon as Harmony brings stable psgi support (Soon™).
> 
> Harmony?
> PSGI?
> 
> I like Bugzilla's features, and I don't use arch's tracker enough to have
> a voice, or maintain it to have a say, but I would still like to provide
> an opinion. It's just an opinion. Having used large bugzilla installations
> like mozilla.org, kernel.org, freedesktop.org, it doesn't look like Bugzilla
> can be fast. I've found Mantis and to some extend Redmine to be fast and
> lean trackers. These may or may not suit Arch's needs, and I still have
> hope Bugzilla will at some point become snappy.
> 
> Just an opinion based on experience, the arch admins/devs will know why
> bugzilla is the right choice. I trust them.

Please don't de-rail the thread. (Obviously the Arch devs also want a
performing bugtracker, but Flyspray has to go either way)

-- 
Jelle van der Waa

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux