Re: Is linux extramodules dir named most appropriately?

To: Bruno Pagani <bruno.n.pagani@xxxxxxxxx>, General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Is linux extramodules dir named most appropriately?
From: Genes Lists via arch-general <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:43:58 -0500
Cc: Genes Lists <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <e2272419-60e9-9dd2-3bd1-3e07d830cf01@gmail.com>
Reply-to: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:59.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/59.0a1

On 1/11/18 12:39 PM, Bruno Pagani wrote:
...

... because the new version of those packages won’t have the dir anymore.

Regards,
Bruno


Ding ... duh of course ...  thank you both for your patience ...

References:
- Is linux extramodules dir named most appropriately?
  - From: Genes Lists via arch-general
- Re: Is linux extramodules dir named most appropriately?
  - From: Eli Schwartz via arch-general
- Re: Is linux extramodules dir named most appropriately?
  - From: Genes Lists via arch-general
- Re: Is linux extramodules dir named most appropriately?
  - From: Eli Schwartz via arch-general
- Re: Is linux extramodules dir named most appropriately?
  - From: Genes Lists via arch-general
- Re: Is linux extramodules dir named most appropriately?
  - From: Bruno Pagani via arch-general