Re: Is linux extramodules dir named most appropriately?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 1/11/18 9:45 AM, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
...

Because the extramodules directory is designated for thirdparty modules
that are believed to be compatible with any kernel patch release of the
same major.minor version. If the module needs to be recompiled with
patch releases, it should be installed to the "main" modules directory.


Terrific thank you.

Do you know where the directory removal logic is managed?

/usr/share/libalpm/60-linux.hook doesn't seem reveal much to my eye - it treats 4.14.13-1-ARCH and extramodules-4.14-ARCH indistinguishably. When linux is updated to 4.15 extramodules gets removed somehow but not with a minor update.

Thanks.

gene



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux