On 10/12/17 03:27, Doug Newgard via arch-general wrote: > To be clear, the real issue people are having with you here isn't your > proposal. It's the fact that you submitted it to the bug tracker, the > maintainer saw it, thought about it, and rejected it, but you couldn't let it > go at that. You instead drew out a forum thread to the point it got closed, > then decided to continue here. That is not the behavior of someone who wants > discussion or to contribute, it's the behavior of someone trying to cause > trouble. It comes across as petty and whiny. Please remember this for future > interactions. > I think you're re-framing the timeline here, possibly showing that your view of events was influenced by your view of me "trying to cause trouble". I was told the forum is a separate entity which devs don't read, hence it was pointless discussing this there. I've already said why I sent to list after the bug report was closed. I don't think I have been disrespectful to anyone in this entire exchange, and have answered or responded to points raised during the discussion. I made one tangential post in response to what seems to be people's fears of posting. But, point taken: I shall remember these events for future interactions. J
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
