On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 09:27:49PM -0600, Doug Newgard via arch-general wrote: > On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 00:10:15 +0000 > Jonathon Fernyhough <jonathon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I submitted, what I thought, was a reasonably structured and detailed > > proposal to change one flag in a PKGBUILD file which would have few (if > > any) side effects. > > > > The whole point of a proposal is to drive a discussion; there is no > > assumption it is absolutely correct. I don't see that as "griping". If > > I'd just said "top sucks, you should fix it", then fine - but I didn't > > do that. > > To be clear, the real issue people are having with you here isn't your > proposal. It's the fact that you submitted it to the bug tracker, the > maintainer saw it, thought about it, and rejected it... In general, discussions about defaults are silly, as long as things are configurable at run-time, so I don't understand why that bugreport was accepted at all... Cheers, -- Leonid Isaev
