On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:10:18 +0300, Francisco Barbee wrote: >You can just ignore this topic instead of writing another post >about how much you don't need it. Hi, you completely missed my point. You ignore that in my opinion, in this context, it's not appropriate to argue with being "a little concerned about arch's overall health", while there is no causal indication for even a hiccup. I'm not necessarily against pathos (I'm not using the term "polemic"). Pathos is a very good tool when making art, but it's not good when trying to get something into a distro, that seemingly already was rejected. Regards, Ralf -- On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:03:21 +0200, Martin Kühne via arch-general wrote: >Money definitely is an important factor. We're all using arch for the >money. No, I'm not interested in money, my aim is world domination to satisfy my interests and much more my compulsion neuroses. If I become leader of the world, all distros are forced to optimize for real-time audio and nobody is allowed to wear blue t-shirts on uneven days and no orange t-shirts on even days. Btw. I guess the OP wanted to point out that Arch is in a bad shape, because "making" (not "using") Arch requires money.
