Re: arch health

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 13:14:08 +0300, Francisco Barbee wrote:
>There was attempt to bring in more optimizations
>already used in Clearlinux project like pgo and
>lto to makepkg but it's still on sidelines due to
>lack of time from devs.

Hi,

are you in a hurry?

IMO it's unhealthy to be in a hurry, apart from this seemingly not
everybody needs those security features.

Arch isn't ill, there seems to be no foreseeable risk that Arch
could become ill.

If somebody should really experience some illness, then please don't be
vague, post a pointer to the illness.

I only claim that I don't experience illness and that my impression is,
that Arch is distinctly healthy. In my experience more healthy, than any
other distro I experience/experienced.

YMMV!

Imagine everybody who wants something, Arch doesn't provide, would
argue with being "a little concerned about arch's overall health", to
get it into Arch.

Regards,
Ralf

Regards,
Ralf



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux