Re: arch health

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 04/19/17 at 06:55pm, ITwrx.org wrote:
> On 04/19/2017 06:32 PM, Dragon ryu via arch-general wrote:
> > 2017/04/20 午前8:30 "ITwrx.org" <info@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > Wait, actual question is about PIE?
> > If you find that package are outdated in community or extra, file a bug rep.
> > Why not do it?
> >
> no, PIE is just one of the examples i listed of symptoms of a larger
> issue that i thought might could be helped by paying devs and
> modernizing the donation system.

PIE is blocked by upstream because of this bug iirc. [1]

> why would i file a bug for an out of
> date package? i'm sure the developer is notified when a package is
> flagged? why should i pester them to update it?

You don't and it's counterproductive, just flag it out of date.
Currently you might experience packages being updated a lot slower since
we have a lot of big invasive rebuilds; OpenSSL 1.1, LLVM 4.0.
Especially the OpenSSL rebuild was painful and time consuming.

[1] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21090

-- 
Jelle van der Waa

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux