Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] Deprecate ABS?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 2017-03-27 02:50, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
> If we are deprecating ABS (which is yay!) then can we get a stable
> release of asp in [extra] to replace it?

That's what we (as in: falconindy) are going to do if ABS gets deprecated.

> Also would be nice to have an official stance on whether full svn
> checkouts are okay, since https://www.archlinux.org/svn/ strongly warns
> people against doing so... and comparing all PKGBUILDs at once is
> somewhat awkward when using separate branches in git (though git-grep
> does take multiple trees at least).

Yeah, full checkout takes a while, although there is no reason to think
that we can't handle it with current infra. I don't understand what do
you mean about branches – our svn2git setup simply mirrors svn structure.

Bartłomiej



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux