Re: sandboxing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Based on the given links and comments I could not
decide on a clear course of action.

If only we w'd have continuous builds of Chromium in
the Ozone-Wayland implementation. Buying a Chromebook
may not be the worst idea after all.

At least this sounds promising:
https://youtu.be/4PflCyiULO4?t=2h31m32s

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WPdUbaJ6_UVxsJ6hLnDpGR-eMvS6j-0tF_TZ62DMtT0/edit?usp=sharing

Or maybe I'll decide on a read-only filesystem, which
is inconvenient and unsuitable for me and my two
simple little laptops running 'n rolling Arch.

Maarten Baert write (in 2014):
> As long as Wayland isn't used together with some
> form of sandboxing, holes in the underlying system
> won't protect you from keyloggers.

As an amateur, it is hard for me to identify likely
attack vectors. I would like to see a package with
a ran{somware,domness} detection daemon in the
official repos, and learn more about machine learning
security models.

Have there been cases of X client mimicry or click-
jacking? I sure a compositor doesn't care about that.

I'm particularly cautious about GUI clicking...

I often look at the source of a web page, or use
a browser extension that allows me to automatically
scrape the target url, as opposed to clicking, which
could trigger anything beyond control. So I'm not
sure about the idea presented here:

http://mupuf.org/blog/2014/03/18/managing-auth-ui-in-linux/

Steve D. Lazaro wrote:
> It’s important to separate authentication from
> authorisation so that spoofing does not compromise
> valuable tokens. (...) An authorisation token is
> typically a one-time use object generated by
> a trusted authority (the compositor) and used by
> the system controlling access to privileged
> interfaces (the WSM). Such tokens can be
> distributed by having the user interact with an
> authorisation UI controlled by the compositor.

I've written down an silly idea (off topic) in
a gist: "Can password typing in the browser
         be made less obvious for a keylogger?"

https://gist.github.com/sharethewisdom/062da46347c93f778e0fae8d30e87090

I've been unsharing and chrooting for a while.
I think I'll symlink most of my configs to a read
only folder, owned by a 'myname.conf' user, and I'll
try and read more about SElinux, MACs etc.

cheers, Bart



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux