Sorry, I thought I had gotten a successful build in my attempts, but I
apparently was mistaken. I certainly got the sources to download,
though. In any case, I apologize that the patch I provided was
incomplete and not thoroughly tested. I appreciate the work you did to
get a successful update of this package working, and I will be sure to
test more thoroughly in the future. Thanks again!
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Guillaume ALAUX <guillaume@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:19 PM, Guillaume ALAUX
> <guillaume@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Kyle Laker <kyle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> The extra/java-openjfx package has been flagged out-of-date since
>>> 2016-09-13 and is stuck at verison 8u76-b03. This can result in
>>> runtime warnings for some JavaFX applications whose FXML was created
>>> specifying a newer API version, potentially causing confusion for
>>> users because `java -version` would return the newest version
>>> (1.8.0_121).
>>>
>>> The following patch (created using `svn diff`) of the PKGBUILD should
>>> bring it up to match the latest version of extra/jdk8-openjdk. No
>>> changes should be necessary for the gradle.properties file.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Kyle
>>>
>>>
>>> Patch:
>>>
>>> Index: PKGBUILD
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- PKGBUILD (revision 287772)
>>> +++ PKGBUILD (working copy)
>>> @@ -12,11 +12,11 @@
>>> pkgbase=java-${_libname}
>>> pkgname=('java-openjfx' 'java-openjfx-doc' 'java-openjfx-src')
>>> _java_ver=8
>>> -_jdk_update=76
>>> -_jdk_build=03
>>> +_jdk_update=121
>>> +_jdk_build=13
>>> _hgtag=${_java_ver}u${_jdk_update}-b${_jdk_build}
>>> pkgver=${_java_ver}.u${_jdk_update}
>>> -pkgrel=2
>>> +pkgrel=1
>>> pkgdesc='Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (open-source
>>> implementation of JavaFX)'
>>> arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
>>> url='https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Main'
>>
>>
>> Thanks. I will try to make some time this week to update it.
>
> Ok so I finally managed to get OpenJFX to build.
>
> It was a bit more complicated than the patch you provided [0] [1] [2].
> I thought you had tested it but I doubt it as makepkg wouldn't even
> download the sources.
>
> [0] https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/java-openjfx&id=512bfaf1653042ce6ead2b5cecdc99942ff25627
> [1] https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/java-openjfx&id=e1947ee35f9d15f1cbddef189c027005eada7424
> [2] https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/java-openjfx&id=8eb70ae9f14e3c87c5f5b5ed7501307ae8ca218e
