On 27.01.2017 22:38, ProgAndy wrote:
Am 27.01.2017 um 21:41 schrieb Eli Schwartz via arch-general:
On 01/27/2017 01:27 PM, Christopher Reimer wrote:
I also noticed a few other pull request trying exactly that, which
were instantly closed by Kevin Mihelich without any reasonable
explanation. That's why I expected some resistance and prepared
myself to counterargument a few of his concerns.
And I think I did quite good. Good enough to make him ignore me.
Oh, he's ignoring you? I must be imagining this quote:
I am speaking specifically to what is or will be officially
supported. The community is free to do whatever it wants outside of
official support, and many people do this already for a number of
boards. Merely including the package here would imply official
support to the vast majority of users despite any 72pt blinking red
warnings we could put up state otherwise. This then leads to said
users expecting us to fix their problems.
This position is no different than it's been throughout the life of
this project. Official support means an active, contributing
developer has access to the hardware and can actively develop
packages and address issues for that target. The hardware that we
choose to spend our time and money on is our own choice, not a
decision forced upon us.
That seems to be a very reasonable position. If the patch is so simple,
then why don't you maintain it and provide the necessary binary
packages? You should be able to create a custom user repository for your
modifications just like we do for Arch Linux for some kernels.
I expected something like this. And as a matter of fact I plan to
provide all necessary parts on my webspace. I even plan to compile and
provide at least all other sunxi based uboot variants.
http://c-reimer.de/alarm/
More will come in a few days. When I have time to write a script to make
things easier.
--
Andreas
