On 07/10/16 at 01:59pm, LoneVVolf wrote: > IF flatpak is to become supported on AL, i'd prefer pacman to handle it > instead of a separate application. flatpak is packaged in [extra], which for me means that it is indeed supported. > > My personal preference though is for AL community to treat flatpak similar > as derivative distros. Huh? I'd say we support running flatpak's, but obviously not what runs in the flatpak :-) > > something like : flatpak is unsupported on Arch linux, ask the flatpak > creator(s) for help. -- Jelle van der Waa
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
