On 10-07-2016 13:18, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote: > Hello, > > On 07/10/2016 01:59 PM, LoneVVolf wrote: >> My personal preference though is for AL community to treat flatpak >> similar as derivative distros. >> >> something like : flatpak is unsupported on Arch linux, ask the flatpak >> creator(s) for help. > > Hm… If there is not that much desire to support Flatpak “officially” as > an Arch project, then I probably will end up setting up a mailing list > and bug tracker on my server sometime in the coming weeks. > > Regards, > Florian Pelz > Personally I'd rather keep using the good old packages _but_ it would be nice to have an official tool to manage/run/create flatpak packages, this just to make sure that in case one needs to use a flatpak package nothing will screw up the filesystem and cause more trouble than it's worth. However a big fat warning should be present somewhere that bugs/problems with flatpak packages are the sole responsibility of upstream/the creator as I suspect bugs and problems will be the norm. -- Mauro Santos
